August 21, 2008
First I'll start with what I liked.The acting was fantastic. Performances were, for the characters in both movies so far, spot on. They knew their characters and their roles, so they didn't have issues with appearing to be off in any way. (With the exception of Rachel Dawes, but of course... was played by a different actress.) The new characters in The Dark Knight were excellent. Heath Ledger really did turn in one of the most phenomenal performances we'll see in a long time... completely unexpected and worth watching the movie for.
What I could forgive...
Was that the visuals between Batman Begins and The Dark Knight were too different. It wasn't as wet and dark as it seemed before. The city didn't even look the same, it didn't resemble the first movie at all. Given the size of the budget, you'd think they'd at least try for something beyond the minimal CGIing of Chicago that they went for. That's a minor point compared to what led me to absolutely hate the rest of the movie.
What I hated is that every scene, every moment in the movie hung by one really thin thread: Perfect timing.
I could even forgive all of the glaring lapses of logic, jumps in the story and major, major, major plotholes... That comes to be something you get used to with dumb hollywood popcorn blockbuster flicks.
I can even accept that one event is an extremely unlikely coincidence, a chance of fate that sets everything else in motion. A person in the right, or wrong, place at the right... or wrong... time.
But The Dark Knight depends on perfect timing for its entire length.
Every scene. Every event that leads to another is absolutely, to exact seconds, perfect timing in execution. This went beyond suspension of belief to "Oh, come on, you've got to be fucking kidding me!" territory.
(Click to see the rest of this entry)




Search



